Capacity to decide, implement and operate
Meridian combines PADIS method, applied industrial experience, implementation coordination and regulatory compliance, with explicit responsibilities.
The work is structured so the client knows what will be decided, who executes each part, how milestones will be accepted and which conditions support the figures presented.
The company was born in applied PADIS
Meridian was created from the work of implementing and operating PADIS. This front brings together products, processes, instruments, monitoring models and criteria for qualification, R&D, RDA and audit.
Module factory implementation was incorporated later, from the team's industrial experience and the curation of the IBIF project. Meridian Regulatory, with Inmetro/PBE homologation as its flagship, came in as market access for modules. The three fronts remain independent engagements.
When the topics meet, PADIS is assessed within the factory's feasibility and can proceed as its own implementation after the industrial decision.
Real experience, with authorship and context
The industrial experience that supports Meridian belongs to the team that runs the fronts, attributed to each person, with context and result.
Each experience cited brings:
- the person responsible;
- the company or project;
- the period;
- the role effectively performed;
- the related capacity or result.
In-house knowledge and specialists per scope
Meridian keeps in-house the intellectual capital that defines the direction, method, criteria and coordination of the work.
Engineering, construction, assembly, certification, legal opinions and exclusive activities are performed by qualified professionals or companies. The contracting form is defined in each project.
In industrial implementation, Meridian may contract part of the suppliers and the client contract another part. The proposal identifies this division and ties timeline, warranty and responsibility to whoever contracts each item.
In PADIS, Meridian implements the controls and trains the team. Later operation may stay with the client or continue monitored, according to the contract.
The work leaves evidence
These instruments allow reviewing the decision, monitoring execution and identifying deviations.
- assumptions map;
- technical-economic model;
- masterplan;
- supplier equalization;
- integrated schedule;
- responsibility matrix;
- acceptance criteria;
- commissioning plan.
- eligibility analysis;
- economic model;
- R&D governance;
- R&D hours control;
- per-project technical report;
- consolidated portfolio management;
- pre-RDA;
- audit preparation.
The scope declares who decides, executes, accepts and warrants
Meridian answers for the activities it takes on in the contract: method, specification, modeling, coordination, governance, training and monitoring.
The client answers for the investment decision, the capital, the data provided, the approvals and its own team.
Suppliers and specialists answer for execution, exclusive acts, performance and warranties of their respective engagements.
Authorities, banks, certifiers and audits keep autonomy over their decisions.
The recommendation defines what to deepen and the conditions to move forward
A project only advances when there is enough basis for the next decision.
For the factory, this requires market, channel, capital, data, access to the decision-maker and willingness to test the assumptions.
For PADIS, it requires potentially eligible product and process, capacity to organize R&D and conditions to operate the controls.
When data is missing, Meridian points out the gaps and the path to resolve them before the next decision.
Start from the company's situation
The initial diagnosis identifies the right front, the available information and the points that need to be confirmed before a proposal.